They all go to Serie A to help the poor through technology. Why does Modric perform better than De Bruyne?

In the 8th round of Serie A, AC Milan was tied with the bottom team Pisa at home. Modric assisted Arte Camé to score the winning goal and was awarded the MVP on the spot.

A 40-year-old all-around fighter, Modric is exactly like Ibrahimovic.

In this game, Modric completed 121 touches and 104 passes, with a passing success rate of 97.1%. He sent 4 threatening balls, 1 of which was converted into an assist, 4 breakthroughs and 2 were successful. All 8 long passes found teammates. The defensive end recorded 2 steals and 1 interception. At the age of 40, he showed the ability of an all-round warrior. Modric's performance is reminiscent of Zlatan Ibrahimovic - he came to AC Milan in the twilight years of his career and changed the pattern of the Serie A championship battle.

It is also technology-based poverty alleviation. Why is Modric better?

Also shouldering the important task of technological poverty alleviation, Modric gets everything he wants in AC Milan, but De Bruyne struggles in Naples. The main reason for this difference is that the "atmosphere" in the team is different. Allegri knows how to build a team around Modric, Rabiot can share his pressure, and Naples also has Anguesa who can serve as a "wingman", but Conte is obsessed with stacking tall players. When the speedy forward Hoylen cannot play (and when he is restricted), De Bruyne's role will be greatly reduced.

Also coming to Serie A from other leagues, Mkhitaryan also played the role of "technical poverty alleviation", which also benefited from the technical flow tactical framework created by Inzaghi Jr. De Bruyne joining the "British Gang" in Naples may not be a good choice.