Darren Bent thinks Enrique adopted Uncle Bo s strategy, and Inzaghi magnifies Amorin s problem

Former England star Darren Bent said in his personal column that the Champions League final and the UEFA Cup final have many similarities, and both losers and winners have many similarities. First, the championship team's strategy is similar, and Darren Bentwood Enrique adopted Uncle Bo's strategy. Darren Bent predicts that the coaching team of Paris Saint-Germain has focused on the progress of the Europa League final, and in this European final, the champion coach has something in common. The reason why Tottenham was able to take the lead in the first half is largely because Uncle Bo opened the offensive formation. Speed ​​players such as Son Heung-min can run through the offensive layout of three lines.

just so happens that Paris Saint-Germain also has a speed offensive player. Dembele is such a typical figure, and the "King of the Ball"'s skills are more comprehensive and delicate. Even if such players are focused on being guarded by their opponents, they can rely on the opening and closing running position to create opportunities for their teammates. Why did Inter Milan lose so many goals? Darren Bent also linked the issues between the Nerazzurri and Manchester United - Inzaghi Jr. magnified the issues of Amorin. Before the Europa League final this season, the Amorin system was at least smooth in the Europa League. Why did he lose to Tottenham, who has similar strength and has also performed poorly in the Premier League?

In Darren Bent's view, Amorin's strategy for the final was too conservative and cautious, which led to the inability of the Red Devils' tactics to be opened. Inzaji undoubtedly magnified this problem. In addition, Inter Milan's lineup is aging and there are too many veterans, so it is normal for them to be scored five. The tactical arrangement of Inzaghi's little tactical arrangement obviously grasped the fatal weakness of the Amorin system - lack of flexibility. When Tottenham cut off the connection between Manchester United's midfielder and the forward through high pressing, Amorin still stubbornly insisted on controlling the ball, which resulted in frequent intercepting the ball in the backcourt and counterattacking. This tactical rigidity may be compensated by the players' personal abilities in the league, but in the final stage where the bayonet is popular, every mistake will be infinitely magnified.

What is even more worrying is the psychological collapse. When Tottenham took the lead early, Manchester United players were obviously anxious, and their pass mistakes increased, and their running became hesitant. Amorin never came up with an effective adjustment plan on the sidelines, but just kept waving his hands to ask the players to "calm down", but failed to reverse the decline through substitutions or tactical changes. Some people would say that Tottenham only won one goal, while Paris Saint-Germain created the biggest score in the Champions League final. Why did Enrique just adopt Uncle Bo’s strategy instead of carrying forward Uncle Bo’s strategy? Darren Bent explained this - the lineup structure of Paris Saint-Germain is still different from that of Tottenham.

, and Enrique has a deeper consideration of the characteristics of the players, so Uncle Bo does not have so many stars. In addition, Tottenham and Manchester United are opponents in the Premier League, and they are more familiar with each other, so Uncle Bo can only let his team score a goal, and he must focus on defense in the second half. Enrique is obviously well aware of this - he understands that Paris Saint-Germain's luxury front group needs more flexible tactical adaptations. In the Champions League final, when Dembele was closely guarded by the defenders of the Nerazzurri, the Frenchman suddenly retreated to the midfield to support the ribs. This seemingly passive running instantly tore the opponent's defensive level.

Duert understood and inserted into the penalty area from the left. Vitinia's long over-top pass was like a precisely guided missile. The entire attack combination was exactly the upgraded version of Enrique's "point-to-face" tactic adopted by Uncle Bo. In his commentary, Darren Bent specifically pointed out that Enrique's understanding of space is master level. When the traditional winger pulls the edge to create width, Paris's offensive system will suddenly shrink into a three-forward formation. This dynamic change makes the opponent's defense always in the dilemma of "demolting the east wall and filling the west wall". Unlike Tottenham who relies on Son Heung-min to explode in a single point, the horror of Paris Saint-Germain is that it can activate the three explosive points of Douai, Dembele and Neves at the same time, just like the three violins played at the same time in a symphony orchestra. The philosophy behind the

tactical board is more interesting. Uncle Bo used Werner as a fulcrum for support at the substitute moment (he was not expected to score, but the German striker could still occupy a position in the penalty area). Now Enrique allows Dembele to play a similar tandem role sometimes, but the Koreans have a larger range of activities - he may have been a wall at the top of the penalty area a second ago, and the next second he appears on the wing to participate in the counter-robbery. This fluidity of all attacks and defenses makes Paris's offense like a prism, and can reflect deadly light at every angle. When the final whistle sounded, the 5-0 score not only confirmed the success of tactical transplantation, but also indicates the direction of the Champions League tactical innovation.