"The dilemma is difficult to solve", Pacers lose G5, it is difficult to play in the series, Su Qun is right

Game 5 of the NBA Finals, the Thunder won the home game and got the match point, the Pacers lost the key battle, the team was facing difficulties, and this round of series is difficult to play, and Su Qun's prediction for G5 is correct again! In the first game of the NBA Finals, the Pacers took the lead with the "decisive ball". G2 and the Thunder won a game back, and the big score was tied at 1:1, G3. The Pacers, who returned to the home court, successfully restricted Alexander. The bench performed with highlights and won the victory and scored a big score, taking the initiative 2:1. G4 "Little Heavenly Kings Mountain Battle" Pacers led by double digits at most. Alexander scored 15 points in the final quarter, freezing the final score at 114:107. The Thunder won away and tied the big score at 2:2. Although the referee's whistle caused "controversy" in this game, most people believed that "defensive to the Pacers", "according to the referee's report in the last two minutes given by the NBA League, all the calls were correct."

G5 Thunder returned to home court and quickly took the initiative. He led by 10 points in the first quarter and won 4 points in the second quarter. He played well in the Pacers. In the third quarter, he scored a 34:28 offensive climax, narrowing the gap to single digits. In the last quarter, both sides played very efficiently. The Pacers lost another 3 points. The Pacers won 5 rebounds, lost 1 assist to the Thunder, were stolen 15 times, blocked 12 times, and made 22 mistakes, 11 more than the Thunder, losing 3 times in three points to the opponent, and the final whistle 109:120. The Pacers fell behind 3:1 in the final finals, losing the "real Tianwang Mountain Contest" and were in a passive situation!

The Pacers who lost the game have difficulty solving the "multiple dilemma" and cannot handle this round of series well. You can imagine how difficult it is to "reversal and turn the tables".

1: Halliburton, who started in G5, played 34 minutes, made 0 of 6 shots in "playing battles", scored 4 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists, 1 blocked, made a mistake, and 3 fouls each, with a positive and negative value of -13, unable to open the offensive shot, unable to make breakthroughs, and making mistakes. The foul "spinned" too much ball rights. G4, Harry Potter can still score 18 points, 2 rebounds, 7 assists, and 2 steals, but the outside line also made 1 of 7 shots, with 5 mistakes. The team lost two games in a row. Halliburton was still fighting for rebounds in Game 5. Halliburton's condition is crucial to the Pacers. If this is not played, it will be difficult to win!

2: G5, the Pacers made 22 mistakes, 11 more than the Thunder. They seized the opportunity to "counterattack" and scored points many times. The organization was connected in place, and the score points were more. The control of the game rhythm was the Pacers' advantage. In this game, the Thunder won the assists, and the Pacers also lagged behind in stealing the defense. Losing the "magic weapon" to win the game also needs to be adjusted urgently.

3: Carlisle, the personnel adjustments in the first game are indeed stronger than Dai Shuai. G4 and G5 have two consecutive games. Carlisle's performance is awkward. It is unreasonable to make a "challenge" decision. It is not reasonable to make a "challenge" decision. The tactical arrangement and lineup adjustment are conservative. Harry Potterton is in poor condition, but he played for a long time, resulting in the inability to connect the offense and defense system and the scoring efficiency becomes worse. Even if he loses the "Tianwang Mountain Battle" and wins back G6, he can compete with the Thunder for "tie-seven" and has a home advantage. Alexander, who has "super hard resolution ability", scores the highest 40 points in the team in the 5th game, creating a "new high" of personal playoff scores. The defense is a new "challenge" for the Pacers.

The above three problems cannot be solved well. The difficulty of the Pacers who were behind 2:3 to win this championship can be imagined. Before the start of the 5th finals, the basketball commentator, Su Qun, said, "In the last moment of the 4th game, the Thunder has its own "weapon", that is, singles, and there is no such person at the Pacers at the critical moment." He made a clear statement and supported the Thunder to win the 5th game. It seems that he is right again!

NBA Finals "The Battle of Kings Mountain" ended, and the Thunder defeated the Pacers 3:2 to get the match point. G6, can the passive Pacers make effective changes? Can the Thunder win the championship with one go? Will there be a decisive game in this round of series? What do fans think?