Why is Boske relatively low-key in world football? He rarely mentions him when talking about excellent coaches?

Bosque is quite excellent. He led Real Madrid to win the Champions League, and the Spanish national team also won the World Cup and European Cup championships. Judging from his resume, he is not bad.

However, compared with other coaches, he still seems a bit lacking in starlight and is not very popular.

When chatting with friends, I also thought about this question. Why is Boske rarely mentioned in football and has a low sense of existence? I think there will be two reasons.

The first point is that his coaching experience is relatively thin and there is no too much topicality.

In his coaching career, what is impressive is that he has coached three teams. The national team is Spain, and the clubs are Real Madrid and Besiktas. The Spanish team has led the team for a long time, while the club is very short.

In 1994, he temporarily put out the fire and led Real Madrid to play some games; in the future, he replaced Toshak, who left the team, and led Real Madrid to play for several years, and was fired because of his performance decline. Although the results are good, because the time is too short, it is easy to pass through the long river of history.

And when he was coaching in the Spanish national team, Bosque, who succeeded Aragonese, coincided with the peak of the team's lineup. Xavi, Iniesta, Villa, Torres, Xavi Alonso and other stars are all on the list.

Because of the gathering of stars and strong strength, the role of the head coach is often easily overlooked by everyone.

Now we talk about the Spanish team in those years. In the past few years, we won the championship in succession in 2010-2012, the most talked about is that there are many stars in the team, which are the golden generation, and they are too strong and invincible without any opponents.

The strong contrast makes the head coach's presence very low. After a long time, it is difficult for everyone to remember who the head coach led by the national team is. The players remember, but the coach can't remember it very clearly.

This would be a reason.

The second point is related to Boske's coaching ability and philosophy.

I wonder if you still remember when Boske left Real Madrid? It was the second day after winning the La Liga championship, and the club publicly announced that it would not renew its contract with Bosque and that Yero would also leave the team.

This incident caused a sensation in the football world at that time, and everyone was talking about it. Bosque was so outstanding and had good results in leading the team. Why did he still fire him?

As a result, Lord Lafayette said something, "Boske has shown the "depletion" of his ability. We must sincerely point out that according to our philosophy, he is no longer a suitable coach."

This sentence is a bit like a drunkard, and there is also a sarcastic feeling behind it, which means that Boske is not good at coaching superstars, his playing style is ugly, and his viewing ability is lacking, which will reduce the style of Real Madrid.

The tactics are well-behaved, do not know how to innovate in technology, can be conservative in order to win, and the style of the game has become pragmatic, which does not conform to the team's values ​​of both winning and playing well. During that time, Boske and Galeries Lafayette were also relatively tense. The head coach hopes to win the championship pragmatically, not to mention accumulating stars to win the championship; the team's senior management will think about exposure, and after accumulating stars to achieve good results to open up the market, there is a serious disagreement in the two sides' concepts.

These conflicts eventually led to Boske leaving Real Madrid sadly, and also made him leave the team with regret.

is also one of the few coaches in football who have excellent grades and are then driven away by the club.

Looking back now, I find that what Lafayette said is not completely wrong. Judging from the style of coaching in the subsequent World Cup and European Cup, Bosque is very pragmatic, and the style of playing in some games will tend to be stable rather than gorgeous.

This has also caused him to have doubts from some media. When losing, some people will mock him, who are not worthy of coaching the Spanish national team and need to leave to take the team a step further.

But here I also want to say something fair. Boske is not without innovation, he still has ideas.

In the 2010 World Cup, he pressed at a high position and emphasized the importance of counter-attack in the front court. After conceding the ball, he actively pressed from front to back, and the local speed-up and short pass penetration were pressed at a very high level. In the 2012 European Cup, he used the frontless formation, which emphasized the control of the ball and the ball, and emphasized the suppression of the pass.

These are still progressive, and solutions suitable for adjustment are also given based on the current mainstream configuration.

It is not fair to say that Boske has no ability at all.

His biggest problem is "conservative". The hypnotic football in the 2012 European Cup, the passing of the ball over and over, it can be seen that he is very rigorous and does not allow the team to make mistakes. He is unwilling to be bold and radical. He would rather control the ball until the end than to ensure an advantage, which will make him lose his attention.

The lineup aging and lacks the speed of adaptation after the 2014 World Cup defeat is also an objective reason for the decline of Spain.

No matter what, when looking back on this history, we still have to agree with Boske's ability to coach. Even though he has a conservative coaching philosophy, it does not conceal his stability in his performance when he led the team.

He still has experience in personnel management and coaching players, and he is also one of the excellent head coaches in football history.

Without him, Spain would not have won the World Cup, and this contribution is worthy of recognition.